Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Direct Purchaser Settlement
3:07-md-1917 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Plaintiffs allege that Defendants and co-conspirators conspired to raise and fix the prices of CRTs and the CRTs contained in certain finished products for over ten years, resulting in overcharges to direct purchasers of those CRTs and products. The complaint describes how the Defendants and coconspirators allegedly violated the U.S. antitrust laws by establishing a global cartel that set artificially high prices for, and restricted the supply of CRTs and the televisions and monitors that contained them.
Class
All persons and entities who, between March l, 1995 and November 25, 2007, directly purchased a CRT Product in the United States from any Defendant or subsidiary or affiliate thereof, or any co-conspirator (“Settlement Class”). For the purposes of the Settlement, Cathode Ray Tube Products means Cathode Ray Tubes of any type (color display tubes, color picture tubes and monochrome display tubes) and finished products which contain Cathode Ray Tubes, such as televisions and computer monitors.
Defendants
- LG Electronics, Inc.
- Panasonic Corporation f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial, Ltd.
- LG Electronics U.S.A, Inc.
- Panasonic Corporation of North America
- LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., Ltd.
- Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company, Ltd. (BMCC)
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Hitachi, Ltd.Philips Electronics North America Corporation
- Hitachi Displays, Ltd.
- Philips Electronics Industries (Taiwan), Ltd.
- Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.
- Philips da Amazonia Industria Electronica Ltda.
- Hitachi America, Ltd.
- LP Displays International, Ltd. f/k/a LG
- Hitachi Asia, Ltd.
- Philips Displays
- Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd.
- Tatung Company of America, Inc.
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
- Samsung SDI America, Inc.
- IRICO Croup Corporation
- Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V.
- IRICO Display Devices Co., Ltd.
- Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda.
- IRICO Group Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Shenzhen Samsung SDI Co, Ltd.
- Thai CRT Company, Ltd.
- Daewoo Electronics Corporation f/k/a Daewoo Electronics Company, Ltd.
- Tianjin Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
- Samsung SDI Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
- Daewoo International Corporation
- Toshiba Corporation
- Irico Group Corporation
- Toshiba America, Inc.
- Irico Group Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC
- Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd.
- Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc
- Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc.
Partial Settlements |
$139,450,000 |
|---|---|
| Chunghwa | $10,000,000 |
| Philips | $27,000,000 |
| Panasonic | $17,500,000 |
| LG | $25,000,000 |
| Toshiba | $13,500,000 |
| Hitachi | $13,400,000 |
| Samsung SDI | $33,000,000 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Indirect Purchaser Settlement
3:07-md-1917 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Class Action Settlements have been reached involving Cathode Ray Tubes (“CRTs”), a display device that was sold by itself or as the main components in TVs and computer monitors. Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants fixed the prices of CRTs causing consumers to pay more for CRT Products such as Televisions and Computer Monitors.
Class
The Settlement Class includes any person or business in Arizona, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, that indirectly purchased a CRT or a product containing CRT, such as a TV or a computer monitor, made by the Defendants from March 1, 1995 through November 25, 2007. Hawaii, Nebraska and Nevada have shorter claims periods. The purchases must have been made for the class member’s use and not for resale.
Defendants
- LG Electronics, Inc.
- LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
- LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co.
- Ltd, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Philips Electronics North America Corporation
- Philips Electronics Industries (Taiwan), Ltd.
- Philips da Amazonia Industria Electronica Ltda.
- LP Displays International, Ltd. f/k/a LG.Philips Displays
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
- Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
- Samsung SDI America, Inc.
- Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V.
- Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda.
- Shenzhen Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
- Tianjin Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
- Samsung SDI Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
- Toshiba Corporation
- Toshiba America, Inc.
- Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC.
- Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
- Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc.
- Panasonic Corporation f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial, Ltd.
- Panasonic Corporation of North America
- MT Picture Display Co., Ltd.
- Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company, Ltd. (BMCC)
- Hitachi, Ltd.
- Hitachi Displays, Ltd.
- Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.
- Hitachi America, Ltd.
- Hitachi Asia, Ltd.
- Tatung Company of America, Inc.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
- IRICO Group Corporation
- IRICO Display Devices Co., Ltd.
- IRICO Group Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Thai CRT Company, Ltd.
- Samtel Color, Ltd.
Settlements |
$576,750,000 |
|---|---|
| Philips | $175,000,000 |
| Panasonic | $70,000,000 |
| Hitachi | $28,000,000 |
| Toshiba | $30,000,000 |
| Samsung SDI | $225,000,000 |
| Thompson & TDA | $13,750,000 |
| Chungwa (previously approved) | $10,000,000 |
| LG (previously approved) | $25,000,000 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
DRAM Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
4:02-md-01486 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Plaintiffs claim violations of federal antitrust laws regarding the sale of DRAM. Plaintiffs allege that the Defendant DRAM manufacturers conspired to fix, raise, maintain or stabilize prices of DRAM sold in the United States. According to class action lawsuits, Plaintiffs believe these Defendants’ activities resulted in overcharges to customers who purchased DRAM indirectly from the named Defendant manufacturers.
The following is a summary for informational purposes only, based on SRG’s review of publically available information regarding the settlement. More information can be found on the Court’s docket and on www.dramclaims.com, which is the official settlement website maintained by the claims administrator appointed by the Court.
What is DRAM?
“DRAM” is defined as dynamic random access memory devices and components, including but not limited to, synchronous dynamic random access memory (“SDRAM”), Rambus dynamic random access memory (“RDRAM”), asynchronous dynamic random access memory (“ASYNC”) and double data rate dynamic random access memory (“DDR”), including modules containing DRAM, RDRAM, ASYNC, and/or DDR.
“DRAM” does not include static random access memory (“SRAM”) devices and components.
These Products Contain DRAM:
- Desktop computers
- Laptop computers
- Servers
- Point of Sales Systems
- Graphics cards
- Video game consoles
- MP3 players
- Printers
- Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs)
- DVD players
- TiVo/DVRs
Indirect Purchaser Class
Any person, business or non-governmental entity who, at any time between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2002 purchased DRAM, or DRAM containing devices, anywhere in the United States indirectly from the Defendants, their parent companies, subsidiaries and affiliates. “Indirectly” means a purchase from any entity other than directly from the listed Defendant manufacturers themselves. Indirect purchases include purchases of DRAM or DRAM containing devices from manufacturers, retailers and resellers.
Defendants
- Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory (USA), Inc. (“Elpida”)
- Hitachi, Ltd. (“Hitachi”)
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc. (“Hynix”)
- Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. (“Infineon”)
- Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. (“Micron”)
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp.; Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. (“Mitsubishi”)
- Mosel-Vitelic Corp., Mosel-Vitelic (USA), Inc. (“Mosel”)
- Nanya Technology Corp., Nanya Technology Corp. USA, Inc. (“Nanya”)
- NEC Electronics America, Inc., presently known as Renesas Electronics America, Inc. (“NEC”)
- Samsung Electronics Company Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. (“Samsung”)
- Toshiba Corp.; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. (“Toshiba”)
- Winbond Electronics Corp., Winbond Electronics Corporation America, Inc. (“Winbond”)
Proposed Settlements: $310,720,000
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
Electrolytic Capacitors Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
3:14-cv-03264 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants colluded to fix prices and restrain trade of aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors. These include capacitor products sold in the United States. Electrolytic capacitors are used in electrical circuit boards to store and release electricity. Capacitors are incorporated into almost every electronic device, including computers, audio and video equipment, automobile electronics such as car engines and airbag systems, and telecommunications equipment.
Class
All persons and entities who, between January 1, 2002 and July 15, 2016 (the “Class Period”), purchased electrolytic capacitors or products containing electrolytic capacitors in the United States directly from any of the defendants, their subsidiaries, affiliates or joint ventures. Excluded from this Class are the Defendants, their parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, co-conspirators and governmental entities.
Settling Defendants
- Fujitsu Ltd.
- NEC Tokin Corporation
- Nitsuko Electronics Corporation
- Okaya Electric Industries
- Rohm Company
Partial Settlements |
$32,600,000 |
|---|---|
| NEC Tokin Corporation | $24,000,000 |
| Okaya Electric Industries | $3,700,000 |
| Fujitsu Ltd. | $2,000,000 |
| Rohm Company | $1,800,000 |
| Nitsuko Electronics Corporation | $1,100,000 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
Electrolytic Capacitors Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
3:14-cv-03264 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants colluded to fix prices and restrain trade of aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors. These include capacitor products sold in the United States. Electrolytic capacitors are used in electrical circuit boards to store and release electricity. Capacitors are incorporated into almost every electronic device, including computers, audio and video equipment, automobile electronics such as car engines and airbag systems, and telecommunications equipment.
Class
All persons and entities who, from January 1, 2002 to April 14, 2016 (the “Class Period”), purchased electrolytic capacitors or products containing electrolytic capacitors in the United States from a distributor or any entity other than a Defendant, that a Defendant or alleged
co-conspirator manufactured. Excluded from this Class are the Defendants, their parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, co-conspirators and governmental entities.
Settling Defendants
- Fujitsu Ltd.
- NEC Tokin Corporation
- Nitsuko Electronics Corporation
- Okaya Electric Industries
- Rohm Company
Partial Settlements |
$32,600,000 |
|---|---|
| NEC Tokin Corporation | $24,000,000 |
| Okaya Electric Industries | $3,700,000 |
| Fujitsu Ltd. | $2,000,000 |
| Rohm Company | $1,800,000 |
| Nitsuko Electronics Corporation | $1,100,000 |
Filing Deadline: Not yet established
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
LCD Flat Panel Products Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
3:07-md-01827 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Plaintiffs allege that, from at least January 1, 1996 through December 11, 2006, defendants operated a cartel, the purpose of which was to raise, fix, and stabilize the prices of Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Displays (TFT-LCDs) and products incorporating TFT-LCDs. TFT LCDs are used in flat-panel televisions as well as computer monitors, laptop computers, mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and other devices. The plaintiffs, who directly purchased from a defendant the TFT-LCDs or the products containing them, allege the defendants fixed the prices of the TFT-LCDs, causing the plaintiffs to pay more than they should have.
Class
All persons and entities who, between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2006, directly purchased a TFT-LCD panel from any defendant or any subsidiary thereof, or any named affiliate or any named co-conspirator. Specifically excluded from the Class are defendants; the officers, directors, or employees of any defendant; the parent companies and subsidiaries of any defendant; the legal representatives and heirs or assigns of any defendant; and the named affiliates and co-conspirators. Also excluded are any federal, state or local governmental entities, any judicial officer presiding over this action and the members of his/her immediate family and judicial staff, and any juror assigned to this action.
All persons and entities who, between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2006, directly purchased a television, computer monitor, or notebook computer containing a TFT-LCD panel from any defendant or any subsidiary thereof, or any named affiliate or any named co-conspirator. Specifically excluded from the Class are defendants; the officers, directors, or employees of any defendant; the parent companies and subsidiaries of any defendant; the legal representatives and heirs or assigns of any defendant; and the named affiliates and co-conspirators. Also excluded are any federal, state or local governmental entities, any judicial officer presiding over this action and the members of his/her immediate family and judicial staff, and any juror assigned to this action.
Defendants
- Acer
- AU Optronics
- Chi Mei Corporation
- Chunghwa
- Epson
- Fujitsu
- Hannspree
- HannStar
- Hitachi
- Hydis Technologies
- IBM
- IPS Alpha Technology
- LG Electronics
- Mitsubishi Electric
- Mitsui
- NEC
- Panasonic
- Philips
- Samsung
- Sanyo
- Seiko Epson
- SharpToshiba
Proposed Settlements |
$473,000,000 |
|---|---|
| Sharp | $105,000,000 |
| Samsung | $82,700,000 |
| Chi Mei | $78,000,000 |
| LG Display | $75,000,000 |
| Hitachi | $28,000,000 |
| HannStar | $14,900,000 |
| Chunghwa | $10,000,000 |
| Epson | $7,000,000 |
| Sanyo | $3,500,000 |
| Mitsui | $950,000 |
| AU Optronics | $38,000,000 |
| Toshiba | $30,000,000 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
LCD Flat Panel Products Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
3:07-md-01827 US District Court Northern District of California
Overview
Plaintiffs allege that, from at least January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2006, defendants operated a cartel, the purpose of which was to raise, fix, and stabilize the prices of Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Displays (TFT-LCDs) and products incorporating TFT-LCDs. TFT LCDs are used in flat-panel televisions as well as computer monitors, laptop computers, mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and other devices. The plaintiffs, who directly purchased from a defendant the TFT-LCDs or the products containing them, allege the defendants fixed the prices of the TFT-LCDs, causing the plaintiffs to pay more than they should have.
Class
All persons and entities in Arizona, Arkansas, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin who, from January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2006, as residents of their respective states, purchased LCD panels incorporated in televisions, monitors, and/or laptop computers in their respective states indirectly from one or more of the named Defendants or Quanta Display Inc., for their own use and not for resale. Specifically excluded from the Class are defendants; the officers, directors, or employees of any defendant; the parent companies and subsidiaries of any defendant; the legal representatives and heirs or assigns of any defendant; and the named affiliates and co-conspirators. Also excluded are any federal, state or local governmental entities, any judicial officer presiding over this action and the members of his/her immediate family and judicial staff, and any juror assigned to this action.
Defendants
- Acer
- AU Optronics
- Chi Mei Corporation
- Chunghwa
- Epson
- Fujitsu
- Hannspree
- HannStar
- Hitachi
- Hydis Technologies
- IBM
- IPS Alpha Technology
- LG Electronics
- Mitsubishi Electric
- Mitsui
- NEC
- Panasonic
- Philips
- Samsung
- Sanyo
- Seiko Epson
- Sharp
- Toshiba
Proposed Settlements |
$1,100,000,000 |
|---|---|
| Chimei | $110,273,318 |
| Chunghwa | $5,305,105 |
| Epson | $2,850,000 |
| HannStar | $25,650,000 |
| Hitachi | $38,977,224 |
| Samsung | $240,000,000 |
| Sharp | $115,500,000 |
| LG | $361,000,000 |
| AUO | $161,500,000 |
| Toshiba | $21,000,000 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
LCD Illinois Flat Panel Indirect Purchaser Settlement
No. 10 CH 34472 Circuit Court, Cook County Illinois
Overview
The Illinois Attorney General is seeking monetary damages incurred by any Illinois resident (person or business) that purchased TFT-LCD panel products between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2006, while residing in Illinois and for their own use and not for resale.
Class
Any person or business that purchased one or more TFT LCD panel products between
January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2006 while residing in Illinois, you may recover damages in this lawsuit by filing a claim. TFT-LCD panel products include most notebook computers with color displays, flat screen monitors, TVs referred to as LCD or LED TVs, cell phones, MP3 players and other small-screen devices with high resolution color displays.
Defendants
- Chungwa
- Epson
- LG
- Hitachi
- Chi Mei
- Sharp
Settlement Fund |
$104,646,436 |
|---|---|
| Chunghwa Settlement | $696,436 |
| Epson Settlement | $4,750,000 |
| LG Settlement | $37,800,000 |
| Hitachi Settlement | $10,400,000 |
| Chi Mei Settlement | $39,000,000 |
| Sharp Settlement | $12,000,000 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.
LCD Washington State Flat Panel Indirect Purchaser Settlement
No. 10-2-29164-4 SEA King County Superior Court, State of Washington
Overview
On behalf of Washington governmental entities and as parens patriae on behalf of Washington consumers, the Washington State Attorney General brought an antitrust lawsuit involving the price of thin film transistor liquid crystal display flat panels (“LCD Flat Panels”). The complaint alleged that the Defendants participated in an unlawful conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices of LCD Flat Panels, resulting in damages to consumers who bought finished products containing an LCD Flat Panel. The case is called State of Washington v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., No. 10-2-29164-4 SEA.
Class Description
The Washington State Attorney General reached a settlement on behalf of Washington consumers. You are eligible to participate in the settlement if you or your business purchased an LCD Flat Panel product between January 1, 1998 and December 1, 2006; and resided or had headquarters in Washington at the time of purchase; and purchased the LCD Flat Panel product from a retailer, distributor, third party vendor or someone other than the manufacturer of the component screen; and purchased the LCD Flat Panel product for your own use and not for resale.
Defendants |
|
|---|---|
| Chimei will pay | $8,750,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| Chunghwa will pay | $428,235 into the Settlement Fund |
| Epson will pay | $2,700,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| Hitachi will pay | $5,200,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| LG will pay | $13,000,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| Samsung will pay | $12,940,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| Sharp will pay | $6,750,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| Toshiba will pay | $950,000 into the Settlement Fund |
| AU Optronics will pay | $12,500,000 into the Settlement Fund |
Total Settlements |
$63,218,235 |
Filing Deadline: Contact SRG
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.